Translate

woensdag 7 december 2016

Wine Harvest Report 2016: Piedmont Starts Late but Ends Strong

An ideal summer in Barolo and Barbaresco made vintners happy


Photo by: Courtesy G.D. Vajra
Warm days and cool nights ripened Nebbiolo throughout the Langhe.

Bruce Sanderson
Posted: December 1, 2016

Unlike other parts of Italy and northern Europe, the 2016 growing season in Piedmont was mostly dry and warm, with enough rain at the right times and ideal conditions for the region’s most important grape, Nebbiolo. Some vintners are comparing it to 2004, others to 2001, both excellent vintages.
Late spring brought cooler-than-usual temperatures, especially at night. This delayed the vegetative cycle and the flowering was two weeks later, resulting in a later-than-average harvest.
Overall, conditions were dry, but there was no drought pressure like in 2007 or 2003, and peak temperatures during the summer months did not spike as they did in 2015 or 2005, according to Giovanni Pasquero Elia, proprietor of Paitin in Neive. “All the grape [varieties] seem more consistent in quality than 2015, with less alcohol and better acidity,” he noted. “It reminds me of 1982, my first harvest.”
Along with the high quality, the quantity was average to slightly higher. Pietro Ratti of Renato Ratti reported about 10 percent higher yields than normal, despite a violent storm on July 26 that unleashed strong winds and hail. Because of the storm, some producers harvested slightly less fruit than average, by as much as 10 percent.
The hail touched a wide area, affecting the lower parts of Castiglione Falletto, Bussia in Monforte, parts of Cannubi, Brunate and Rocche dell’Annunziata in Barolo and La Morra, before passing through Verduno. There was also extensive damage in parts of Monferrato, particularly Nizza. However, Ratti said that in his Costigliole vineyards a few miles away it didn’t even rain.
The weather leading up to the harvest was ideal, with sun and the good temperature swings between day and night that are so important for the development of Nebbiolo’s aromas. Whites were picked beginning Sept. 5, with the reds following, beginning with Dolcetto and Barbera. Picking of Nebbiolo began during the last week of September and continued through the third week of October.
“Nebbiolo arrived at a good level of sugar quite soon, but the phenolic maturation wasn't there yet, the skins very strong and the taste of the berries still green, so we waited for another two weeks before their harvest,” said Claudia Cigliuti, who makes the wines at her family’s winery in Barbaresco. “We picked the Nebbiolos from the 3rd to the 8th of October.”
Now that fermentations are complete, winemakers report that the wines are aromatic, well-balanced and the Nebbiolo in particular appears well-structured for aging.


Source: http://www.winespectator.com/webfeature/show/id/Wine-Harvest-Report-2016-Piedmont

maandag 5 december 2016

Jefford on Monday: The taste of Cava

Jefford on Monday: The taste of Cava

Andrew Jefford considers the role of indigenous grape varieties in Cava and other sparkling wines.
Recaredo's Xarel-lo grapes. Credit: Andrew Jefford
The taste of Cava is important.  It matters, indeed, even to those who never drink sparkling wine.  If this sounds bizarre, bear with me.
Champagne – no surprise here — is the dominant force in sparkling wine.  More than that: it’s one of humanity’s happiest achievements, like the invention of the piano or the bicycle.  Take a flock of low chalky hills in the dour, agri-industrial landscape of northern France, plant three members of the Pinot family, harvest them just before winter slams the door on summer, then manipulate the results with cunning craftsmanship.  The result is the most famous wine in the world, and a symbol and metaphor for celebratory ease and sensual finesse.
Within the wine world, Champagne’s dominance of its category means that there is an almost-unquestioned assumption that all sparkling wine should be made in that way, and from those varieties.  It’s wise to assume the former.  The latter, I’d suggest, is often an error.
Chardonnay and the two Pinots make impeccable sparkling wine in the Champagne region, where they can snail towards ripeness over a cool, fretful summer.  In sugar terms, they don’t fully ripen– but the Champagne method, and a little chaptalisation if necessary, compensates for that.  Phenolically, by contrast, the long season gives these varieties a perfumed, vinous, nuanced and teased ripeness which makes Champagne sing.  (Climate change gives the nearby UK a plausible stab at pulling off the same trick.)
Once you start to shift the varieties towards lower latitudes, by contrast, those varieties begin to lose their interest.  No grape variety, remember, is universally great.  They are only great in a certain place on earth, with all that that means in terms of soil, topography and climate.  Champagne’s hegemony has been wonderful for Champagne, but it may have held other sparkling wine producers around the world in check.
It’s true that in very cool places (Tasmania comes to mind), Chardonnay and the Pinots may indeed be the best choice pending the revelation of better options, for which experiment is needed.  In warmer locations, though, Chardonnay and the Pinots are often a poor choice.  In order to give a sparkling wine something resembling ‘a Champagne balance’, the varieties have to be picked inarticulately early, long before they have achieved any kind of phenolic maturity; and in such locations, when phenolic maturity eventually comes, it will be much less subtly constituted than in Champagne anyway.  An alternative (and often a complement) is for producers to adjust acidity, thereby making an industrial product whose fine-wine interest drops swiftly away.

‘The best Cava is a fine sparkling wine of genuinely indigenous style’

Take a look at the varietal nuancing which unfolds during a sparkling journey south from Champagne towards Cava.  We clip through the Loire valley, where the climate and soils are still close enough to those of Champagne for Chardonnay-Pinot sparklers to work well, even if Chenin Blanc creates more interesting and regionally characterful sparkling wines.  Chardonnay and Pinot Noir can make Crémant de Bourgogne a plausible Champagne substitute (remember Chablis’s close proximity to the Champagne’s Aube region), though Chardonnay begins to assert its still-wine varietal character once you are south of the Yonne, and especially so if the raw materials come from southern Burgundy or Beaujolais.  (I plan to take a close look at Crémant de Bourgogne in 2017.)
By the time we reach Limoux in the cool upper Aude valley, the rules regarding grape varieties for sparkling wine are in sensible modulation, reflecting latitude.  Yes, you can use Chardonnay and Pinot Noir, but there is little chance down here of phenolic ripeness outrunning sugar ripeness and delivering a full-season Chardonnay or Pinot grape with a potential alcohol of just 9.5% or 10%.  Most Crémant de Limoux is in fact principally a blend of Chardonnay and Chenin, while the more interesting Blanquette de Limoux is based on the perfectly site-adapted local variety Mauzac.  The result is a set of often refined sparkling wines which do not unsuccessfully ape Champagne, but reflect their surroundings.
Press on over the Pyrenees and down the Mediterranean coast to Catalunya, and for the first and only time in the wine world you will come across a major sparkling wine region using the ‘traditional method’ whose very greatest wines do not include Chardonnay or either of the red Pinots, but are crafted from the indigenous varieties Macabeo, Xarel-lo and Parellada.  (Prosecco, too, is based on its own indigenous variety Glera — but most is made by the Charmat method, known in Italy as Metodo Martinotti.)
Limestone pebbles typical of the Cava region. Credit: Gramona
The result, in the case of the best Cava, is a fine sparkling wine of genuinely indigenous style.  One which, in other words, not only has Mediterranean scents and flavours, but whose balance is necessarily and appropriately different to that of Champagne.
The taste of Cava matters, then, not only because the finest examples are beautiful in their own right (see the tasting notes below), but because it could and should serve as a model for sparkling wine produced in lower latitudes and warmer locations.  Take away the bubbles, and it illustrates one of the fundamental truths of terroir: the necessity to be honest about exactly which varieties are well adapted to a site, and the duty to work with those if you want to make wine which can give fullest voice to the potential of a place.
Of course you can make a counter-argument based on the commercial desirability of sparkling wines based on the Champagne formula.  Moreover because technique and craft plays a larger role in the creation of sparkling wine than of still wine, skilled practitioners can do “a decent job” with Chardonnay and Pinot Noir almost anywhere, not least in Catalunya itself.  The result, though, will always be some sort of a compromise — and at the highest levels, that’s not enough.
Describing Cava
Fine Cava is customarily un-dosed (though one of the four Cavas below has 6 g/l) and is intrinsically well-balanced in that state.  The acid profile is gentler than for Champagne, though the indigenous varieties are still picked relatively early; its factors of balance are texture and aroma rather than acidity alone.  The spectrum of aromas and flavours is unique, Mediterranean in inspiration and allusion, and quite different from those of Champagne.